Oddjob
Merry fucking Xmas to you assholes
In a carbon sense, yes. Also it's a lot easier dealing with nuclear waste in geological stable sites then widely dispersed carbon emissions.Nukes are low environmental impact then I guess? Uh huh….
If nukes were required, I would be first in line to ignore the waste problems and the eye watering cost and say bring it on.
But they’re not needed, they are high impact and very very very high cost. As I said, the cost delays actual decarbonisation…
French nuclear energy is some of the cheapest energy in Europe. The UK pays more for energy than France despite widespread adoption of offshore and onshore wind and that's forecast to rise by 50% this year. Germany, Italy et al are facing much the same problems but with the added complication of Russian gas.
Sent from my M2012K11AG using Tapatalk