The Duckmeister
Has a juicy midrange
Republics still usually have a parliament of at least two parties of corrupt knuckleheads, so no difference there. The difference with a republic is that the Head of State, basically final decision-maker, is also popularly-elected, which brings the risk of any flippin' dingbat getting plonked in by bogans. Take USA as a case against rebublicanism.....!Most leading financial academics say a republic is a much more effective and efficient system than the current system of 2 party's of stupidity and corruption. Also we're a independent and financially wealthy country who needs no affiliation with Boris's damp little island.
Also take the Union Jack off the flag.
Although in title the British monarch is our Head of State, in reality the monarch's representative in the form of Governor-General, appointed by parliament holds sway. So in effect our system fits somewhere in the middle.