Metal Working! Fitting, Machining, Welding, Sheet and General Metal Fab

link1896

Mr Greenfield
Incorrectly Functioning Penis
Now now, no judgement around here. I’m sure life still has meaning and purpose. Or so they tell me.


The IFP, internal floating piston, is the most popular method to seperate the gas from the oil in a damper. The oil needs to be pressurised so it doesn’t cavitation during fast strokes, sit back down komdotkom.

Say you’re landing the bike from a big jump, the shock is slammed hard to full stroke. The shaft speed is very high. The shock’s damper provides some energy absorption via damping, aka resisting the pistons travel through the oil. What we call compression damping. The oil’s viscosity works in conjunction with the compression circuit to provide this resistance. When oil cavitates, it changes state from liquid to a gas. Gas has a fraction of the viscosity of oil.

Now on the rebound stroke, the spring or air can is providing maximum rebound force. The rebound damping circuits job is to slow this down, so we don’t have a pogo stick. If the gas pressure on the ifp wasn’t there, the oil wouldn’t be pressurised, and again we’d have massive, temporary viscosity loss due to cavitation, and a pogo stick.

Here is a cutaway of an old RP23 shock, with the IFP circled.

The IFP fjohn860 is talking about wasn’t in the damper side of a shock, but for a dual air chamber setup in forks. Instead of volume reducers, you can run a slave air chamber. The IFP separates the high pressure and low pressure air chambers. The main chamber, in the fork stanchion can be set at a lower pressure, for better coil like feel. The air chamber is set higher, becoming an influence on the air spring force, as the fork goes deeper into its travel.


Check here for a lovey little animation.


 

Ultra Lord

Hurts. Requires Money. And is nerdy.
Now now, no judgement around here. I’m sure life still has meaning and purpose. Or so they tell me.


The IFP, internal floating piston, is the most popular method to seperate the gas from the oil in a damper. The oil needs to be pressurised so it doesn’t cavitation during fast strokes, sit back down komdotkom.

Say you’re landing the bike from a big jump, the shock is slammed hard to full stroke. The shaft speed is very high. The shock’s damper provides some energy absorption via damping, aka resisting the pistons travel through the oil. What we call compression damping. The oil’s viscosity works in conjunction with the compression circuit to provide this resistance. When oil cavitates, it changes state from liquid to a gas. Gas has a fraction of the viscosity of oil.

Now on the rebound stroke, the spring or air can is providing maximum rebound force. The rebound damping circuits job is to slow this down, so we don’t have a pogo stick. If the gas pressure on the ifp wasn’t there, the oil wouldn’t be pressurised, and again we’d have massive, temporary viscosity loss due to cavitation, and a pogo stick.

Here is a cutaway of an old RP23 shock, with the IFP circled.

The IFP fjohn860 is talking about wasn’t in the damper side of a shock, but for a dual air chamber setup in forks. Instead of volume reducers, you can run a slave air chamber. The IFP separates the high pressure and low pressure air chambers. The main chamber, in the fork stanchion can be set at a lower pressure, for better coil like feel. The air chamber is set higher, becoming an influence on the air spring force, as the fork goes deeper into its travel.


Check here for a lovey little animation.


Brilliant explanation.
You should start a weekly “learning things with link” thread.
 

Jpez

Down on the left!
Brilliant explanation.
You should start a weekly “learning things with link” thread.
If you’ve got the patience or intelligence of which I lack both Steve from Vorsprung does brilliant YouTube vids on all sorts of nerdy suspension topics. I try but just glaze over by the halfway point or I learn something new but because my brain is only so big when something new goes in something old goes out.
Definitely worth a look though.
 

Ultra Lord

Hurts. Requires Money. And is nerdy.
If you’ve got the patience or intelligence of which I lack both Steve from Vorsprung does brilliant YouTube vids on all sorts of nerdy suspension topics. I try but just glaze over by the halfway point or I learn something new but because my brain is only so big when something new goes in something old goes out.
Definitely worth a look though.
Yeah and it translates well to moto, I forward vorsprung vids to mates all the time rather than try and explain compression/rebound etc.
 

Haakon

has an accommodating arse
Not my own work, but had a duct piece made up. Not entirely to spec sadly and I’m going to have to rethink my attachment strategy somewhat but they refused to remake it the way I asked which was … disappointing…

I gave them the internal dimensions and asked for insulation which I assumed would go on the outside. Leaving me the full 40mm on the turnout at the end to attach to the timber frame it’s going into. But they put the insulation on the inside, robbing me of 25 of the 40mm for the turnout. Not ideal…

oh well, I’ll make it work with only fixings on the sides… Also, who knows if rockwool insulation is a good idea for inside a duct…? Feels like a dodgy idea, spreading fibreglass dust through the system!

edit - insulation seems legit. Odd. The perforations are a neat idea though making it act like a muffler. Mildly annoying they didn’t want to own their error, but I’ll live. Was only $360 which felt reasonable given the work that appears to gone into it.

IMG_5077.jpeg
IMG_5075.jpeg
IMG_5076.jpeg
 
Last edited:

Flow-Rider

Burner
Yes indeed. Given all the PPE recommendations when dealing with it for wall insulation batts, I’d have assumed it was a no no for an area where it’s going to blowing air over it and into living spaces!
It should have filtering on the air ducts, but I can't imagine the condensation being a good thing for it either.
 

Ultra Lord

Hurts. Requires Money. And is nerdy.
There's also the bible... But who reads books these days .
If a youtube video is too much for them I have little hope a textbook will help. Some people just hit the send button regardless of whats happening under them haha.
 

Mattyp

Cows go boing
I guess this fits here...
Have had some spare timber and offcuts of RHS laying around for probably over a year after I got Jpez to make me up a timber bench top for a desk.
Been staring at them for a while meaning to do something with them, turns out I had a few spare hours yesterday and today so drew something up, and went to work. Used the offcuts from the 2 middle shelves to make a 4th one, it's a little short and had I thought about it harder would have taken an extra 10mm off the other 2 to make it bigger but it'll do.
PSX_20240404_160041.jpg
PSX_20240404_160109.jpg
PSX_20240404_160138.jpg
PSX_20240404_160235.jpg
 

Dales Cannon

lightbrain about 4pm
Staff member
I know a lot of you guys are used to working off CAD templates but my experience this time is that it is way too inaccurate and I mean the holes aren't even round, no dimensions and the lines are all wonky like a manky hobo chewed them and don't ask about squareness.



Anyway I went old school and redrew it. Need to throw some dimensions on, wait for a sunny day so I don't have to swim to the shed and get stuck in.

 
Top