nzhumpy
Googlemeister who likes bikes and scandal
And BMW coming to the party as well.So, hydrogen from seawater hey?
That's interesting isn't it!
And BMW coming to the party as well.So, hydrogen from seawater hey?
That's interesting isn't it!
You can start here lol. There's a databaseIt is uncommon, I can't find any of the videos or stories on this except the couple of times it happened to old mate Jordan.
Nah. They may have head him speak about one topic and formed a view and decided that they didn't want to hear or let anyone else hear those or any other view he haS.What a weird thing to say. Of course they have heard his arguments, that's why they are showing up to blast him. He got blasted for refusing to use people's preferred pronouns. Why does this hurt conservative christians so much? It's weak. It deserves a protest.
I first learned about the guy through that stuff (the meat book thing really was for the lols), which is what seems to have made him popular with the MRA/Incel crowd. Had a peruse of it and wasn't impressed. The pronoun thing doesn't come naturally to me, but as far as I'm concerned if somebody wants to be addressed in a particular way I'll do my best to get it right. No reasonable person on either side of the exchange will begrudge it taking some time.So like I said he's got some shitty views. I don't like his stuff about traditional home/marriage/nuclear family views. His refusal in pronouns is borderline
Some very quick research says C-16 didn't make using the wrong pronouns illegal. Rather, repeated and/or intentional misgendering could already constitute harassment pursuant to human rights and employment law prior to Bill C-16, which only concerns a few areas like banking and air travel. Again this very much sounds like a reasonable person on either side is unlikely to find themselves in this situationHe kicked up a fuss about the Canadian government making it law to use chosen pronouns or risk a discrimination charge at best or a hate crime at worst depending on the interpretation of the law at the time.
I haven't researched this, but would be very very surprised if this is a widespread problem, casually entered into with minimal oversight. As far as I'm aware Peterson isn't medically qualified or an expert on the topic, and I'd certainly be looking to those people for an opinion first. If there is some un-biased fact-checked source of information on the topic I would be interested to see it.The guy also has strong views on gender reasignment of children as young as 6 (not saying they do surgery, but all the precursors to it, hormones etc). That's pretty sensible. Theres clinic's in the US helping kids who litterally can't consent to anything, make life altering choices based on a parents say so. Some of the stuff were seeing now is these kids reaching adulthood not realising that these activities made them sterile, or aren't actually trans.
Maybe he does have a range of interesting and well informed views on some of the other 99% of topics. But when I've been served a plate of clickbaity fish that doesn't smell very nice, there isn't a huge incentive to dig through the carcass to find the good bits. In this case, 'ignorance' really will be bliss.Seriously, the guy has a huge academic background and his ideas on gender politics is litterally less than 100th of the stuff he could talk about. something you realise when you take the time. Whether you do, couldn't care less, but it does make you look ignorant to those that did take the time.
This is like the Andrew Tate is good for fitness tips argument. Petersen is a complete fucking gronk. He might have a "huge academic background" but the fact that he spouts the shit he does means no-one gives a fuck. It's not disingenuous or ignorant, it's just that he doesn't have a right to a platform and to amplification of his bullshit views. There are literally thousands/millions of other people around the world doing valuable intellectual and academic work that goes to all of these "issues" you want to have a debate on, who aren't divisive shitcunts looking for a headline.Seriously, the guy has a huge academic background and his ideas on gender politics is litterally less than 100th of the stuff he could talk about. something you realise when you take the time. Whether you do, couldn't care less, but it does make you look ignorant to those that did take the time.
Came to write something along these lines, but this is put better I probably would have.This is like the Andrew Tate is good for fitness tips argument. Petersen is a complete fucking gronk. He might have a "huge academic background" but the fact that he spouts the shit he does means no-one gives a fuck. It's not disingenuous or ignorant, it's just that he doesn't have a right to a platform and to amplification of his bullshit views. There are literally thousands/millions of other people around the world doing valuable intellectual and academic work that goes to all of these "issues" you want to have a debate on, who aren't divisive shitcunts looking for a headline.
Sorry dude but the only person who looks ignorant in the last however many pages of this conversation is you, because you're just banging the same wokefeministcancelculturemeansmencan'tsayanythingthesedaysyou'reallsnowflakesyouneedtogetoveryourselvesandlistentowhatJPissayinghe'saprophetofourtimesevenifyoudon'tlikehowhesaysithemakesomegoodpoints BS as all the other apologists for inflammatory dickbags out there because he reinforces your own biases whether they're conscious or not.
I haven't researched this, but would be very very surprised if this is a widespread problem,
Agree and given how much harm is also coming from stuff like the tavistock clinic mentioned above, it makes it worse. Complex problems with complex solutions deserve some serious considerations, not giving in to the loudest voices.As an aside, I find the massive anti-trans thing going on at the moment really unsavoury. Clearly about as vulnerable a group as you'll find in society, with everyone taking the opportunity to get their oar in.
herein lies the problems with how we treat this stuff and the basis of much of my argument. In anycase there a difference in wondering what somone like peterson is about vs somone like Andrew tate. You watch one tate video you've seen them all. And many people will watch that one click bait piece (whoever it is) and that's the guy/girl/xe forever.Maybe he does have a range of interesting and well informed views on some of the other 99% of topics. But when I've been served a plate of clickbaity fish that doesn't smell very nice, there isn't a huge incentive to dig through the carcass to find the good bits. In this case, 'ignorance' really will be bliss.
That's right, neither should the law. Provisions for gender already existWhy the fuck do you care what someone wants to "identify" as or whatever the fuck its called. I dont care, nor should you.
The shit ou refer to is littlerally the only clickbaity stuff you've seen on one or two topics. So yeah I don't think I'm ignorant here. But you do you.This is like the Andrew Tate is good for fitness tips argument. Petersen is a complete fucking gronk. He might have a "huge academic background" but the fact that he spouts the shit he does means no-one gives a fuck. It's not disingenuous or ignorant, it's just that he doesn't have a right to a platform and to amplification of his bullshit views. There are literally thousands/millions of other people around the world doing valuable intellectual and academic work that goes to all of these "issues" you want to have a debate on, who aren't divisive shitcunts looking for a headline.
Sorry dude but the only person who looks ignorant in the last however many pages of this conversation is you, because you're just banging the same wokefeministcancelculturemeansmencan'tsayanythingthesedaysyou'reallsnowflakesyouneedtogetoveryourselvesandlistentowhatJPissayinghe'saprophetofourtimesevenifyoudon'tlikehowhesaysithemakesomegoodpoints BS as all the other apologists for inflammatory dickbags out there because he reinforces your own biases whether they're conscious or not.
That canadian law is about discrimination and hate speech. Basically, if youre going to be chunt about it, you can be slapped for it. Same as you would be if you were a chunt to people for any other reason.That's right, neither should the law. Provisions for gender already exist
Aren't the existing provisions for sexual orientation, gender etc?That canadian law is about discrimination and hate speech. Basically, if youre going to be chunt about it, you can be slapped for it. Same as you would be if you were a chunt to people for any other reason.
So settle down with all the "but me rights! " bullshit.
Whats your point? Dont discriminate and/or be chunt about someones preferred pronoun or whatever. Clearly not making that basic idea explicit meant some turds thought it was ok to be a chunt about it. Dont be a chunt. the end.Aren't the existing provisions for sexual orientation, gender etc?
Ok so a very cursory google reveals:.World's Largest Pediatric Gender Clinic Shut Down Due To Poor Evidence, Risk of Harm and Operational Failures
The UK’s National Health Service will close the world’s largest pediatric gender clinic, the Gender Identity Development Service in London (GIDS) often known as the Tavistock, after the NHS Trust which houses it. An independent review condemned the clinic as “not a safe or viable long-term...segm.org
We never got the details on the aliens.This was so much better when it was just about aliens.
This was so much better when it was just about aliens.
Aliens in Area 51 can't be a thing or they would have found some caddying at Mar a Largearsehole.We never got the details on the aliens.
Here this will make it better.
That's better ..wheeeee..Here this will make it better.
Sent from my M2012K11AG using Tapatalk