CHEWY
Eats Squid
Every bike is a DH rig.I just struggle with the idea of putting something over 1kg, like a DHF II on the front of my bike if it’s not a DH rig.
Every bike is a DH rig.I just struggle with the idea of putting something over 1kg, like a DHF II on the front of my bike if it’s not a DH rig.
Plus get all touchy about alloy vs. brass nipples on CF wanker wheels with the aim of rotational weight weenie saving then fit chunky phat rubber on them.I just struggle with the idea of putting something over 1kg, like a DHF II on the front of my bike if it’s not a DH rig.
In a 64-spoke pair of wheels, the difference in nipple weight is about 50g, so pretty close to f-all. Durability of brass is streets ahead, so really no contest, brass all the way.Plus get all touchy about alloy vs. brass nipples on CF wanker wheels with the aim of rotational weight weenie saving then fit chunky phat rubber on them.
I know personally it is hard to avoid and have done it and will do it again but seems stupid in the bigger picture.
Even before cushcore and other tyre noodle devices are mentioned.
What then does the "F" in DHF stand for?DownHill Race... Not rear.
My Anthems would beg to differ....Every bike is a DH rig.
DHR = DH rear…DownHill Race... Not rear.
Freeride I think from memory...What then does the "F" in DHF stand for?
DH freerideWhat then does the "F" in DHF stand for?
Snap.Freeride I think from memory...
I run Dissector on the front at 2.6, and High Roller II back in 2.4. Plenty fast for me in Canberra, could have used more chunk at Thredbo. Not as taxing to push along flats and ups as DHR/F. I was running dual HR's before.@Scotty T runs them and likes them for Canberra to my knowledge. I ran one on the front for a while but prefer the grip of the DHR-ll.
Been loving it to be honest. DHR2 seems to do really well in the front, and I haven't had any issues with grip in the rear. Rekon definitely not as grippy as a DHR2 (not supposed to be either though), but it's much faster rolling & still has decent corner knobs that are predictable. In the past i've swapped the Rekon to the front and run a Rekon Race or Aspen 2.4 in the rear which works well too - more slidey in loose corners but still predictable.F: 2.4 DHR-II EXO MaxxTerra
R: 2.4 Rekon EXO Dual Compound
How does this combo go? A mate warned me off the Rekon but to me it looks like a faster DHR2, which is what I run on the back in DC (same as you up front).
They need to bring back the On The Rocks II.Griffus 2.5 | Mountain Bike Tire | Hutchinson Cycling
Discover the Griffus 2.5 tubeless and tube mountain bike tires. Trail, downhill, freeride and racing mtb tires. Bike wheels : 27 inch, 29 inch bike tires.cycling.hutchinson.com
Frenchies again for me. 2.5 for the front. 2.4 for the rear.
Measure on the sidewalls for actual vs claimed width.Good point about actual tyre sizes. Measuring side knob width I measured the following tyres all within 1mm of each other. Onza aquilla 29x2.4, maxxis assegai 29x2.5 and goodyear Newton ST 2.6. The assegai and aquilla were identical width on the knobs and the Newton ST was 1mm wider. Casing was similar width on all 3 visually but I didn't pull out the vernier.
Keep that in mind when sizing different brands tyres.
My oldest one loves Der Kaisers, even pays for them himself... 2 new ones just rocked up in the last German order.The Conti Der Baron and Der Kaiser are as fat the WE, a true 2.4. Makes the Goodyears on the Trance look skinny
Only a couple of rides on it, seems pretty nice.
What? Young ratbag buying his own shit?? Wonders never cease!!My oldest one loves Der Kaisers, even pays for them himself...
Lately any special parts they want, they buy themselves.What? Young ratbag buying his own shit?? Wonders never cease!!
At 1500g they'd have to be damn near solid tyres!Dad will buy them Schwalbe Bike Park Tyres, sticky as hell with Rhinoskin sidewalls and at 1500g I reckon they are near bulletproof.