wtr
Likes Dirt
Don't know about what the situation is like up there in NSW, but down here in VIC many of those I know, even including my old man and I. Had been subjected to what we believed to be "legitamite robberies". By that, I mean those expensively thin infringement notices the coppers have been handing out.
Naming a few cases:
*Work colleague copped a fat $141 fine and 3 points off for sitting in her car in the carpark without her seatbelt on while the car was off but keys in ignition. She was already tailled since entering the carpark.
*Boss copped a $120 for "reckless driving" after passing both breathalyzer and ID checks, guilty of swerving between lanes, with have a tonne of stocks worthed $6ks in the back of the van.
*Dad copped not 1, not 2, but 4 $109-112 fines from a fixed location camera during a 2 week period. He hasn't had ONE single speeding tickets in the last 3 yrs! I've already lodge a complain to the Ombudsman to investigate the accurracy and consistancy of the equipment.
*Paid my fine back in Feb for not having my P's up in the car I in. Last month I got a letter along with ANOTHER infringement notice from the same guy for the same cause, 3 months after the initial matter was sorted. His reason for sending me another one? "the dates on the previous notice issued was incorrect, a refund will be sent out, and you'd have to pay it again". 3 weeks passed, no refund yet. Will be giving him a nice grill when I catch him on duty on saturday at the station.
Here's a little something I dug up..
The juicy bits.
Feel like starting a protest or riot of some sort? Just reassuring that the money they are netting are actually spent on services they were ought offer. When getting around to my friend's cleaned-out house took 45mins since she reported it seeing figures from outside, one would think they should just stick to the lightning reactions of a speeding pursuit.
Naming a few cases:
*Work colleague copped a fat $141 fine and 3 points off for sitting in her car in the carpark without her seatbelt on while the car was off but keys in ignition. She was already tailled since entering the carpark.
*Boss copped a $120 for "reckless driving" after passing both breathalyzer and ID checks, guilty of swerving between lanes, with have a tonne of stocks worthed $6ks in the back of the van.
*Dad copped not 1, not 2, but 4 $109-112 fines from a fixed location camera during a 2 week period. He hasn't had ONE single speeding tickets in the last 3 yrs! I've already lodge a complain to the Ombudsman to investigate the accurracy and consistancy of the equipment.
*Paid my fine back in Feb for not having my P's up in the car I in. Last month I got a letter along with ANOTHER infringement notice from the same guy for the same cause, 3 months after the initial matter was sorted. His reason for sending me another one? "the dates on the previous notice issued was incorrect, a refund will be sent out, and you'd have to pay it again". 3 weeks passed, no refund yet. Will be giving him a nice grill when I catch him on duty on saturday at the station.
Here's a little something I dug up..
The juicy bits.
Mr WHELAN said:I refer to Budget Paper No. 3, Volume 2, page 563. In view of the commissioner's assurance that no quota system has applied in New South Wales, can the Minister advise me how the additional $26 million shown under Operating Statement at page 563 is to be raised?
Mr WEST said:I do not have the detailed knowledge of the information you seek in respect of that item. However, let me pick up on what you have referred to as a quota system and reaffirm that when I took responsibility for this portfolio area I asked for advice because it was a matter of some concern. As a result I was assured, and continue to be assured, that there is no quota system and therefore no revenue projections can be linked to that. However, it is important that we have a system for reviewing the quality of infringements that are processed by police officers of this State. I hope - and I know the commissioner has constantly asked - that the police officers of this State are not just out there intent on achieving numbers but are actually issuing infringements that are directed towards ensuring the safety of individuals and other road users. That is the important direction that we should be looking at.
Feel like starting a protest or riot of some sort? Just reassuring that the money they are netting are actually spent on services they were ought offer. When getting around to my friend's cleaned-out house took 45mins since she reported it seeing figures from outside, one would think they should just stick to the lightning reactions of a speeding pursuit.
Mr WHELAN said:The Minister mentioned quality of offences. Are you suggesting now that there is going to be a new regime of police traffic infringement notices and increased fines?
HA!Mr WEST said:No, what I am indicating is that, in the review by commanders of the work that is done by our police officers, there should not be - as you have implied - a quota by number but there should be, obviously, a review by commanders of the types of infringements, to make sure that they are directed towards providing increased road safety in the State. That is the direction in which I believe our officers should be maintaining their activities.
Last edited: