Yes, but people also want a popular/ist leader who legitimises their nasty narrow stupid view of the world because it’s less work than learning anything…I think that's only part of it. I feel that a lot of the appeal of Trump, Hanson, Bolsanaro, le Pen, etc. is that they are not from the political mainstream (or that's at least how they've remodeled themselves). People are losing faith in mainstream democratic leaders, largely because of the bullshit we get from them, like not introducing an ICAC, having parties during lockdown, trading shares with insider info whilst in office, taking money from secret donors, etc.
People want authenticity and leadership, and next to the self-serving narcissists we get, these right wingers and populists look more authentic, so people support them as a pressure release for their frustrations. They allow them their failings - such as racism, protectionism, sexism, etc. - because they feel they know what they're getting instead of being sold lies and spin.
A dissatisfied and divided demos is fertile ground for populists and people selling relief.
Yep, cherry pick the characteristics that the unwashed will applaud so you can get a seat at a governmental table for the next few years.Can't see the irony?
One of the best responses to our dopey MSM ever.This was fucking Brilliant.
AFR (and Ron Mizen) are not Murdoch, AFR is owned by Nine Entertainment.
This was fucking Brilliant. The whiny little murdoch shitstain asking the gotcha crap fact-checking 'question' is Ron Mizen from the AFR. What a cunt.
I'm not sure that's correct though. IT's not necessarily that the people support it, it's that it can be used against them through the usual demagoguery - ramping up the threat rhetoric and making the other side look weak. ALP are always scared of being called on national security (I don't really understand that reputation, but people believe it). So the ALP always run from any threat of 'looking weak'.I think we also need to acknowledge the Australian people's role in these policy decisions. If the ALP believed the people didn't support the policy then they would have opposed it and used it against the LNP. Unfortunately they believed, and correctly I suspect, that people didn't care enough to risk the potential fall out.
The reality we live in is that the 1 or 2% of us that actually give a shit and educate ourselves on these matters will always be overwhelmed by the 98% that don't give a shit or are just too stupid.
Yes this is a lovely statement that bears a lot of truth but... Having lived in North Queensland, Northern WA, Tasmania and the southern states of the USA I have a reasonable grasp of the shear level of hatred and racism out there. Most of these people and groups don't realise just how they are being used but also don't really give a shit when someone tries to help them.I'm not sure that's correct though. IT's not necessarily that the people support it, it's that it can be used against them through the usual demagoguery - ramping up the threat rhetoric and making the other side look weak. ALP are always scared of being called on national security (I don't really understand that reputation, but people believe it). So the ALP always run from any threat of 'looking weak'.
IT can also be that the people that care about it are in swing seats (back then it was western Sydney they were aiming at), with the other elctorates maybe caring, but voting on other issues. We have to be careful about holding holier-than-thou, elitist attitudes. Other people have other priorities and we don't necessarily know what they are. There are always trade offs and comprimises, no single party will ever embody everything that we prioritise.
Both LNP fanboys. it's hard to tell them apart.AFR (and Ron Mizen) are not Murdoch, AFR is owned by Nine Entertainment.
I think the issue is that politicians confuse populism with pandering/pork barreling. And only talk about what’s good for the people either in the lead up to an election or in opposition. My2c.When did populism become a dirty word? We really need to be freed from the tyranny of big corporations.
When did populism become a dirty word? We really need to be freed from the tyranny of big corporations.
Amaury?I think it primarily became a dirty word under the regime of Perón.