Who is? I'll enlist. Got a link for the internet lazy/unskilled?They're looking for steering committee members now, you should volunteer! That way you'll get exactly what you want, even without lifting a shovel.
Seriously, get over it. There's no 'secret' FoBR crew; there's people who dig, people who ride, and people who do both. If there is, then I don't know who you're talking about because it's too secret for me and I've made most of the working bees this year.Still nothing from the FoBR crew.
This is an excellent point. Rock armouring is difficult to do at Bruce, as there's actually not heaps of big rocks near the new descent track, but it would significantly help and just requires dedication and a wheelbarrow next time someone's keen to do it. The ongoing maintenance is challenging, but if the trail is worth it then I'm sure we can spend a higher level of resources on this and lower levels on other parts like the outer loop near Calvary, which only seems to need the notches re-cut anually and some hedge trimming.<points about runoff being MTB related etc, requirements for obstacles to manage water flows and erosion etc>
But at BR, the trail maintenance challenge there is harder... there are more limitations as pointed out. To begin with there are no more new trails and there other unpublished reports that talk about other things. So I’m going to put it out there, where are the areas that people think the maintenance activities should focus on – is there scope for a planned approach? There are certainly areas that would benefit from armouring, rollers and other measures. There is room for some thinking about the new descent which is steep and a bit like The Luge in terms of its need for future maintenance.
Some discussion on this would be worthwhile.
Some weeding and community engagement needs to be done too <cough>FoBR<cough>
*cough*In terms of broader community consultation, how would you like this to be achieved? Current avenues used by FoBR are:
I would suggest PCS put a sign up at the trailhead except that, as far as I know, no one ever sees the trailhead (I didn't know it existed in my first year riding there). I am keen to hear what other avenues you would like used.
- Government (PCS)
- Farkin
- The Berm
- FoBR bulletin board
- Build days
However, I noticed on the weekend that a truckload of decent sized rocks has been dumped at the top of the new track, where it crosses the main FT. They look to be failry good sized, What are the plans for these?as there's actually not heaps of big rocks near the new descent track,
Agree, but would also addI think the key areas that need a fair bit of maintenance would be:
- descent track
- the flowy switchbacks next to Belco way
- pruning for the inner loop near the skinny logs
- those few corners that seem to always blow out on the calvary side, there's about three
.
... dickish behavior ...
... Can't wait to see how dumbed down the outcome is at Majura..
I’m not sure I suggested anything about secret. I have suggested that it would be great if the FoBR crew engaged here in an open discussion about future trail works rather than just telling people when and where to turn up and dig. Who knows, maybe more people would get involved if this was the case.Seriously, get over it. There's no 'secret' FoBR crew; there's people who dig, people who ride, and people who do both. If there is, then I don't know who you're talking about because it's too secret for me and I've made most of the working bees this year.
The map here is shaded with areas of potential difficulty.Shading areas of potential trail difficulty would be more appropriate for the Majura plan.