back in 2009, Scott made a production carbon road bike that was illegal for UCI events.Surely there would be an easy weigh in check? An 8kg race bike isn't going to weigh 8kg with motor and batteries? :noidea:
I see x-raying bikes or something similar before riders are allowed out in big races in the future. If my bike was tuned within an inch of its life before a race I wouldn't want some UCI git then pulling it apart immediately prior to a race.Other than running a pedaling aid, there isn't much else you could do on a bicycle that would give you an advantage over the competition. It'd be a massive dick around pulling the bikes apart to check every one of them but it may be required if shitbags like this lot in question are going to cheat.
Agreed, mate of mine rides a Look road bike that is way under the UCI limits and there is still room to move with lighter wheels etc.back in 2009, Scott made a production carbon road bike that was illegal for UCI events.
http://www.bikeradar.com/gear/category/bikes/road/product/review-scott-addict-ltd-09-31974/
The new Addict is so light that, when it comes to the UCI weight limit for bikes in sanctioned competitions it’s illegal.
A size S bike prepared for the Challenge Mallorca weighed so little – 6.2kg – that weights had to be added on to legalise it.
Scott says the frame can weigh as little as 796g, which explains why a complete size S bike is a headache for the scrutineers and mechanics.
That's back in 2009. I suspect carbon fibre frame making has advanced since then.
I wonder if there are any motors in XC MTB events. wouldn't surprise me at all.
Agreed. My issue is this had to be driven by the team (and possibly the manufacturer). I think her punishment should be on a par with a similar offence by a drug cheat. The team and especially management should be shown the door and told never to return in any capacity. I would also expect questions to be asked of the manufacturer, if they had any involvement show them the door as well.Other than running a pedaling aid, there isn't much else you could do on a bicycle that would give you an advantage over the competition. It'd be a massive dick around pulling the bikes apart to check every one of them but it may be required if shitbags like this lot in question are going to cheat.
I am looking forward to SamD's take on this :spy:It's a sad day for CX...good day for mtb's:boink:
AHahahahaaa! The dirt is coming out on this cheating family eh?... And her brother is currently serving a ban for using EPO.
Travis.
Do you think he may be involved? The timing is right, maybe this is his big introduction to the world of lazy bike riders taking over? Cyclocross and E bike's go well together.I am looking forward to SamD's take on this :spy:
You could just use a magnet or an x-ray machine like at the airports.Other than running a pedaling aid, there isn't much else you could do on a bicycle that would give you an advantage over the competition. It'd be a massive dick around pulling the bikes apart to check every one of them but it may be required if shitbags like this lot in question are going to cheat.
They actually add weight to some of the road bikes so that they can pass the UCI rules.Surely there would be an easy weigh in check? An 8kg race bike isn't going to weigh 8kg with motor and batteries? :noidea:
In that video, she clearly has the legs on everyone else. Is it possible that she is better than everyone else and won the trophy or is it the gear grinder kicking in?[video=youtube_share;kv3CiyrRTMg]http://youtu.be/kv3CiyrRTMg[/video]
With much less upper body movement, she appears to be doing it much easier than EVERYONE ELSE in the field and she's pulling away at the same time. I think one or the other may be possible, but not both at the same time. Looks suss.In that video, she clearly has the legs on everyone else. Is it possible that she is better than everyone else and won the trophy or is it the gear grinder kicking in?
In Everyone of those videos demonstrating the tech the motor is audibly noticeable, how are they doing it silently? Surely a competitor next to such a rider would hear it when the motor is engaged?
I can't help but think that any sort of extra propulsion would force your rear wheel to spin. Let's face it, a CX bike doesn't have a huge tread pattern and depth to start with, surely an extra helping of horsepower would force a reduction in grip and could even do more harm than good?With much less upper body movement, she appears to be doing it much easier than EVERYONE ELSE in the field and she's pulling away at the same time. I think one or the other may be possible, but not both at the same time. Looks suss.