Litenbror
Eats Squid
Great photo is yours @Boom King?This Rail?
Great photo is yours @Boom King?This Rail?
That looks like itThis Rail?
No, was taken by someone that knows their way around a camera, therefore doing justice to the rider puctured. I'm an all around hack.Great photo is yours @Boom King?
Yep same as me, I blame the potato phone but it knows the truth.No, was taken by someone that knows their way around a camera, therefore doing justice to the rider puctured. I'm an all around hack.
Nicely done young shredder!@russthedog, someone’s Rail landed a 4th in elite at King of Ballarat. Still loving it silly…
Oh dear...it is important to note that yoke driven suspension designs such as Revel Bikes often rely on the air spring providing a structural element.
This is nothing new? Many many bikes have this setup - have a look at google and you will see. Coil shocks generally have a thinner shaft which flexes more.Oh dear...
It's almost like you don't want bushing bind and excessive wear in your shock?A normal shock, air or coil should never be used as a structural element in a suspension design. They are not designed for any amount of side loading although some may tolerate this better than others.
You sure he wasn't just poking fun at how you ride itPurely for interest sake, I tested for flex on Felix’s Rail just now, with and without the shock connected.
Felt no discernible change in rigidity, and noticeably stiffer than any my my own bikes. Used wheel to flex, all running running basically the same wheels.
He definitely rates it as stiffer than his previous burly Kona, and commented the other day at the Youies that my Rune felt like a wet noodle after doing a run on it
I wish he was. ‘Unstable’ was also mentioned, but I used the ‘short chainstay’ defence. He was too polite to argue.You sure he wasn't just poking fun at how you ride it
He didn’t say exactly that, in all honesty, but I was paraphrasing. I think it was more about the geometry, but the Rail is very rigid.Runes aren’t exactly a wet noodle, that’s pretty impressive.
This is exactly what I mean - if there is better wording than structural element I am happy to use it, but I consider resistance to side loading as providing a structural element?A normal shock, air or coil should never be used as a structural element in a suspension design. They are not designed for any amount of side loading although some may tolerate this better than others.
How did the rotec compare?Purely for interest sake, I tested for flex on Felix’s Rail just now, with and without the shock connected.
Felt no discernible change in rigidity, and noticeably stiffer than any my my own bikes. Used wheel to flex, all running running basically the same wheels.
He definitely rates it as stiffer than his previous burly Kona, and commented the other day at the Youies that my Rune felt like a wet noodle after doing a run on it
Dunno, hasn't been out of the rafters in 6 months, but likely to be insanely stiff. It's short travel and overbuilt AF. Not comparing apples with apples.How did the rotec compare?
Still I like to compare avocados with coconuts sometimes.Dunno, hasn't been out of the rafters in 6 months, but likely to be insanely stiff. It's short travel and overbuilt AF. Not comparing apples with apples.