They have literally been forced to do so, because of some sneaky law changes to favour musk.
So pension funds investing in the F100 are forced to buy despite the fact that Musk doesn’t have to show anybody the books beforehand like every other company had to.
Sometime in August the'll have to publish quarterly earnings.....
I'll open by stating quite clearly that I am a big grizzly bear on AI.
The BS that Musk pulled with SpaceX is clearly BS. I haven't met a single serious investor who thinks SpaceX was a good buy at launch. Most think a fair valuation is in the $50-$75USD range. Which coincidentally is the kind of valuation that aligns with the first few fundraising rounds. In the meantime, SpaceX has been an absolute cash burning machine.
The view of many bears such as myself, is that Musk was forced to pull off this float to reward these early investors. It was the only way to deliver any kind of return when there was no prospect of profits any time soon.
My friends in private equity have labelled it as 'getting retail investors to hold the bag'.
Super funds are well aware of this too and a lot of them have outright banned the holding of SpaceX until they turn a consistent profit.
Nasdaq tracking ETFs are in a tougher position, but some of them have launched twins that don't contain SpaceX.
If you want to short SpaceX, it's a bit hard to do because the float of shares is so thin. But you can trade derivatives, if you want to ride the Bear...
Sent from my 24069PC21G using Tapatalk