Bit slimmer and rounder than I'd normally go for, but performance is amazing.I heard the Aggressor is a bit undersize?
It is the same size as a Minion DHF 2.3.I heard the Aggressor is a bit undersize?
You are such a tyre whoreIt is the same size as a Minion DHF 2.3.
Thanks. I prolly won't bother with it then.Yeah it's a skinny 2.3 for sure.
I have definitely been known to have the odd spare tyre on hand.You are such a tyre whore
You should.Thanks. I prolly won't bother with it then.
HR2 is worth a go, I love mine up front paired with a 2.4 Ardent down back (used to run 2.25 which was fine too).I need a 2.4-2.5 26" front that works on loose over hard (Perth and its shitty pea gravel). It needs to be tubeless or convert to tubeless easily. I was thinking the folding 2.4" HR2 or even and On-One Chunky Monkey might fit the bill. Terrain can be harsh at times and I don't mind going through rocks.
I'd look at pairing it with the 2.25" Ardent out back or moving the 2.3" HR2 to the back. Grip over rolling resistance at this time, don't want to go to wire DH tyres.
Seconded. Call it the minion trail. A little slower rolling on the rear than an xc tire or semi slick but great cornering, climbing, braking grip.Bit slimmer and rounder than I'd normally go for, but performance is amazing.
Magic Mary is the best I've found for those conditions up frontI need a 2.4-2.5 26" front that works on loose over hard (Perth and its shitty pea gravel). It needs to be tubeless or convert to tubeless easily. I was thinking the folding 2.4" HR2 or even and On-One Chunky Monkey might fit the bill. Terrain can be harsh at times and I don't mind going through rocks.
I'd look at pairing it with the 2.25" Ardent out back or moving the 2.3" HR2 to the back. Grip over rolling resistance at this time, don't want to go to wire DH tyres.
So... you just described the aggressor? but, perhaps you want it in a 2.4?Seconded. Call it the minion trail. A little slower rolling on the rear than an xc tire or semi slick but great cornering, climbing, braking grip.
Fantastic match for a dhf front on a trail/enduro bike.
+2 for the Aggressor, don't know how you get away with 22/23psi and running tubes. I destroyed an Aggressor Exo and then a DD running 23psi and tubeless on a 30mm internal rim. Love the tyre, just wish it also came in a DH casing for those times when you need that little bit more strength. I've gone to a DHR2 and I really notice how much slower rolling it is. Grip wise, the tread on the Aggressor was absolutely brilliant, I wouldn't say the DHR had better grip.+1 Aggressor on the rear for me. 2.3 with the DD casing. Great all around performer that handles jumps, drops and high speed rock gardens without fuss. I have tubes (I know! I must get around to going tubless!) and run it at around 22/23psi on a 25mm internal rim. Never had a flat and you can see by the sidewalls, I ride in a rocky area. Great match with a HR2 up front IMO.
View attachment 335993
Forgot to mention I also run a Maxxis Freeride tube, so that may have something to do with it. But yeah, definitely tubeless is on the cards for me at some stage.+2 for the Aggressor, don't know how you get away with 22/23psi and running tubes.
Yeah, we have gone over that a few pages back. It's only available in single compound, and makes a great rear tyre for anything up to proper dh or anything too wet.. but I reckon it's not quite trustworthy enough to have up front until it comes in a 3C compound.. aI've been riding Derby / Hollybank / Trevallyn with Aggressor + HR2 combo.
Soo much grip, at any speed, at any angle.
But, how many 'burners have tried the Aggressor on the front?
I'm thinking I might try Aggressor front & rear next....
Yeah, we have gone over that a few pages back. It's only available in single compound, and makes a great rear tyre for anything up to proper dh or anything too wet.. but I reckon it's not quite trustworthy enough to have up front until it comes in a 3C compound.. aI've been riding Derby / Hollybank / Trevallyn with Aggressor + HR2 combo.
Soo much grip, at any speed, at any angle.
But, how many 'burners have tried the Aggressor on the front?
I'm thinking I might try Aggressor front & rear next....